15 Aug 2025 09:08:50
STEVIE, you bring up a good point, FOREST are looking to the future, with Marinakis pushing them, and are where WH should be

WH are being overloaded with debt, by a board who's combined wealth make Marinakis a pauper
WH do NOT NEED to borrow, the volume of money, they are receiving at the present, time
Sullivan is up to something, this is not the way forward
WH are borrowing against every asset they have, for NO KNOWN REASONS, it's certainly not for team investment! Groundwork's or anything like that
There is something going on in the background, I hope maybe a sellout / takeover in the future
But at present it looks very bad financially, that if the Club drops a division, with these massive debts, we could go bankrupt, without the imput of Premier league funds, that's where we are, you might ask yourself these questions
A what on earth do WH need money for if it's not for players, or club investment
B it's not to pay off old debts, that's been done previously
C Where has this money gone, or going too?
D Be under no illusions, if the club drops a division, it would become virtually impossible to service, or pay off these debts, in the championship
E think you have the picture?

1.) 15 Aug 2025
15 Aug 2025 09:35:02
Haven’t you noticed anything about Forest? They have only started spending now they know they have the riches from the Europa League we don’t have that income or the pull of playing in Europe. Prior to that they only spent the money from the Elanga transfer.

2.) 15 Aug 2025
15 Aug 2025 10:05:48
RIGHT AND WRONG, they have been clever and careful investors since promotion, more to the point, and this is the difference Hammer John, they have a clever ambitious and driven owner, we DONT, Sullivan is driven only by money, without, any alllegiance or benefit to WH football club, don’t be fooled or deceived otherwise
The latest piling of debt without investment, proves that point, without argument
Until a statement comes forward, showing or pointing out what these borrowings are for, there is no challenge to that argument